|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 94-99
Quality of life among adolescents with acne in a tertiary referral centre in Bangalore, South India
Belliappa Pemmanda Raju, Umashankar Nagaraju
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
|Date of Web Publication||27-Mar-2017|
Belliappa Pemmanda Raju
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Kambipura, Mysore Road, Bengaluru - 560 074, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Acne is a common problem in adolescent children and has a considerable impact on their quality of life (QoL).
Aims: The impact of acne on QoL in Indian adolescent patients remains undocumented. The study was undertaken to detect the impact of acne vulgaris in adolescents on the QoL using two questionnaires: the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) and the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI).
Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based, prospective, cross-sectional, prestructured, questionnaire-based study done on 140 consenting individuals, who attended the Acne Clinic of our Dermatology Outpatient Department. Acne vulgaris was graded using simple grading system. QoL was measured using a combination of skin disease-specific (CDLQI) and acne-specific (CADI) questionnaires.
Results: The study population included 140 cases with a female:male ratio of 1.5:1. Comedones (123, 87.9%) were the most common type of lesion. Grade I acne was the most common clinical type (76.4%). There was a statistically significant difference between acne severity and gender. The overall mean CDLQI score (7.21 of maximum 30) and the overall mean CADI score (4.8 of maximum 15) were low, indicating a mild impairment of QoL among adolescents. Statistically significant association was noted between CDLQI and CADI scores and grade of acne. There was no statistically significant association noted between CDLQI and CADI scores and gender.
Conclusion: Although acne had an impact on patient's QoL, it was less severe in our study. The CDLQI and CADI questionnaires represent simple and reliable instruments for the assessment of QoL among adolescents and should be incorporated when managing acne patients to provide better and appropriate care.
Keywords: Acne, adolescents, Cardiff Acne Disability Index, Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index
|How to cite this article:|
Raju BP, Nagaraju U. Quality of life among adolescents with acne in a tertiary referral centre in Bangalore, South India. Indian J Paediatr Dermatol 2017;18:94-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Raju BP, Nagaraju U. Quality of life among adolescents with acne in a tertiary referral centre in Bangalore, South India. Indian J Paediatr Dermatol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Sep 18];18:94-9. Available from: http://www.ijpd.in/text.asp?2017/18/2/94/203007
| Introduction|| |
Acne vulgaris is the most common dermatological condition encountered in adolescents. More than 85% of adolescents suffer from acne, and in 50% cases, it extends into adulthood. Acne commonly involves the face. Facial appearance represents important aspects of one's perception of body image. Therefore, it is not surprising that a susceptible individual with facial acne may develop a significant psychosocial disability. Adolescence is a time of struggle for self-identity when teens and young adults have a need to look their best, they frequently have acne, which makes them feel and look their worst.
The WHO defines quality of life (QoL), as the “individual's perception of their position in the context of culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns”. It provides a valuable insight into the debilitating effects of acne that patients do not address themselves. Several general health-related QoL (HRQoL) measures and acne-specific HRQoL questionnaires have been developed. Finlay and Khan developed the widely used Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI), for use in research studies and routine clinical practice to assess changes in HRQoL, as it is a sensitive measure. Although the general measures serve the purpose of assessing the impact of dermatologic conditions on patient's life, acne-specific HRQoL assessment can offer a focused insight into the negative effects of acne. It is the most sensitive way to determine the impact of acne and its effects on patients while excluding irrelevant symptoms. Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) was developed to quickly assess the level of disability caused by acne. There is a dearth of published information on the impact of acne in adolescents on Indian patients which need to be assessed. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of acne vulgaris on the QoL in adolescents.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This study was a hospital-based, prospective, cross-sectional study done on 140 consenting individuals, conforming to the inclusion and exclusion criteria who attended the Acne Clinic of the Department of Dermatology for 2 years from August 2011 to July 2013. Individuals between 13 and 18 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris were included in the study after obtaining informed written consent. Patients suffering from medical disorders or on topical and systemic drugs known to predispose them to acne or likely to interfere with assessment of acne and nonconsenting patients were excluded from the study.
A detailed history pertaining to sociodemographic data, presenting complaints, duration of acne, personal history/factors aggravating acne, presence of medical/surgical diseases, family, and treatment history were elicited. Examination for acne included the head and neck only. All the manifestations of acne from comedones to nodules were recorded. Acne vulgaris severity was graded using a simple grading system as follows:
- Grade I: Comedones, occasional papules
- Grade II: Papules, comedones, few pustules
- Grade III: Predominant pustules, nodules, abscesses
- Grade IV: Mainly cysts, abscesses, widespread scarring.
QoL was measured using a combination of skin disease (Children's DLQI [CDLQI]) and acne specific-questionnaire (CADI). The CDLQI and CADI questionnaires were used as the study instrument for this study after obtaining formal written permission from Professor Andrew Y. Finlay. CDLQI is a validated questionnaire which grades QoL by assessing the following domains: (a) physical symptoms and feelings (questions 1 and 2), (b) daily activities (questions 3 and 4), (c) leisure (questions 5 and 6), (d) work/school (questions 7), (e) personal relationships (questions 8 and 9), and (f) treatment (question 10). Each question is scored as “very much” (score 3), “a lot” (score 2), “a little” (score 1), and “not at all” (score 0), keeping in mind the problems faced in the previous week due to the disease. Final CDLQI score is the sum of all scores (range: 0–30). High scores indicate poor QoL. Results from 0 to 1 mean no effect of the disease on the patient's QoL, 2–5 mean small effect, 6–10 mean moderate effect, 11–20 mean great effect, and 21–30 mean a very important effect.
CADI is a well-validated, self-reported questionnaire comprising five questions with a Likert scale and four response categories (0–3). The five questions relate to feeling of aggression, frustration, interference with social life, avoidance of public changing facilities, and appearance of the skin all over the last month and an indication of how bad the acne is now. The final score ranges from 0 to 15. CADI scores were graded as low (0–4), medium (5–9), and high 10–15. High scores indicate a higher level of disability. CADI identifies the area of concern in patients with acne. The patient's response to the questionnaire is significantly correlated with the clinician's assessment of acne severity.
The data collected were tabulated using Microsoft Excel Worksheet, and computer-based analysis was performed using the Statistical Product and Service Solutions 16.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). The categorical variables were summarized as proportions and percentages. The continuous variables were summarized as mean and standard deviation. The level of significance was set at P< 0.05 and 95% confidence interval. Statistical test used was Chi-square test.
| Results|| |
The study population included 140 cases with a female:male ratio of 1.5:1. The mean age was 15.26 ± 2.51 years (ranging from 13 to 18 years). Furthermore, maximum patients (66%) were among 16–18 years. Duration of acne was <6 months in most cases (45%).
Type of Lesion
Comedones (123, 87.9%) were the most common type of lesion. Papules were seen in 76 (54.3%) patients, followed by pustules (18, 12.9%) and nodules (5, 3.6%).
Grading of Acne
Grade I acne was the most common clinical type (76.4%), followed by Grade II and III (16.4% and 6.4%). Furthermore, males had more severe disease: among Grade III acne, 66.7% were males and only one patient had Grade IV acne, which was a male. There was a statistically significant difference between acne severity and gender (P = 0.013) [Table 1].
Scoring of Acne Based on Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index and Cardiff Acne Disability Index
The mean CDLQI score was 7.21 ± 4.82 (ranging from 0 to 26) and the mean CADI score was 4.8 ± 2.9 (ranging from 0 to 15). The most common CDLQI score observed was in the range of 2–5 (small effect) in 56 (40%) patients and that of CADI was 0–4 (low) in 84 (60%) patients, which implied that the majority of them had mild psychological impact. Statistically significant association was noted between CDLQI and CADI scores and grade of acne (P < 0.0001 for CDLQI and P< 0.0001 for CADI, respectively) [Table 2] and [Table 3]. The impact on QoL increased with the facial acne severity. There was no statistically significant association noted between CDLQI and CADI scores and gender (P = 0.9 for CDLQI and P = 0.5 for CADI, respectively) [Table 4] and [Table 5]. This is an important finding as there may be a perception among health professionals that facial acne will have less impact on males and also showed that males were concerned about their acne.
|Table 2: Distribution of acne grading based on Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index score|
Click here to view
|Table 3: Distribution of acne grading based on Cardiff Acne Disability Index score|
Click here to view
|Table 4: Distribution of Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index scores based on gender|
Click here to view
|Table 5: Distribution of Cardiff Acne Disability Index scores based on gender|
Click here to view
Based on the specific responses of CADI, 60.7% of the adolescents reported that they felt aggressive, frustrated, or embarrassed as a result of having acne [Table 6].
| Discussion|| |
Adolescence is a time of physical, emotional, and social development. Acne is a common adolescent problem, affecting more than 85% of teenagers, as well as some adults. Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory disease of pilosebaceous unit. The pathogenesis is attributed to multiple factors such as increased sebum production, follicular hyperkeratinization, proliferation of Propionibacterium acnes within the follicle, alteration of the quality of sebum lipids, regulation of cutaneous steroidogenesis, androgenic activity, interaction with neuropeptides, and exhibition of pro- and anti-inflammatory properties. Although some consider acne to be merely a cosmetic problem, it may have significant and enduring emotional and psychological effects. Acne can negatively impact mood, self-esteem, and interpersonal relationships and may lead to depression and suicidal ideation.,, There are studies assessing the impact of acne on QoL from various countries such as Greece, Malaysia, Cleveland, the USA, Spain, the UK, Iran, and Southern Brazil, whereas studies on Indian patients are reported less frequently.
The age group of acne vulgaris patients included in different studies done in this regard is variable. Most of the studies ,,,, have included an age group between 13 and 18 years and some studies ,, from 11 years and some , from 17 years. The present study included age group between 13 and 18 years.
In this study, females were more commonly affected than males (ratio of 1.5:1). However, male students were found to have more moderately severe acne compared to female students. The findings are consistent with previous studies done in other countries., Males tend to have more severe acne compared to females because they have oilier complexion and their androgen levels are higher.
In our study, the mean CDLQI score was 7.21 and the mean CADI score was 4.8 and majority of them had mild psychological impact. However, the study by Jankovic et al. reported the overall mean scores for CDLQI to be 4.35 and for CADI to be 3.57 which is rather low and also reported that acne is associated with the impairment in HRQoL. Other previous studies performed among adolescents in other countries have also reported similar findings.,,
This study demonstrated a statistically significant association between CDLQI and CADI scores and severity of acne. The impact on QoL increased with the facial acne severity. This result is consistent with previous studies which also demonstrated a fairly good correlation between facial acne severity and CDLQI/CADI scores.,, This implies that impact of acne on QoL must be considered in the management of facial acne.
This study showed no statistically significant association between CDLQI and CADI scores and gender. The impact of acne on QoL was similar between genders. This result is consistent with a previous study by Hanisah et al. which also found no significant difference in the CDLQI/CADI scores between the genders. This is an important finding as there may be a general perception that facial acne will have less impact on boys and also stresses the fact that boys also experience psychological morbidity and were concerned about their acne. However, this contradicts results from previous studies which found that girls generally experience more psychological morbidity than boys.,
CADI helps assess the QoL in students with acne. The subscales include feeling of aggression, frustration, interference with social life, avoidance of public changing facilities, and appearance of the skin. In this study, analysis of the subscales showed that 60.7% of the adolescents had particular difficulties in the areas of emotion (felt aggressive, frustrated), and 43.6% had social interference/difficulties. Hanisah et al. reported difficulties in the areas of emotion (felt aggressive, frustrated) in 71% of adolescents and social interference/difficulties in 58.7% of adolescents. A study among teenage Scottish schoolchildren reported that 50% of pupils were emotionally affected, 20% of pupils were affected in their personal and social lives, and 10% avoided swimming and other sports because of their acne. In this study, 11 (7.9%) students scored 10–15 in CADI which was equal to severely impaired. However, the median score of CADI was 4.9, which was low. This implied that, overall, the students were mildly affected psychologically. This could be due to the higher prevalence of mild acne among adolescents. Hanisah et al. also reported the median score of CADI to be 4, which was low.
| Conclusion|| |
Facial acne is common among adolescents and can cause major impact on their QoL. There was a significant association noted between CDLQI and CADI scores and grade of acne. There was no significant association noted between CDLQI and CADI scores and gender, which means that males were also concerned about their acne. Most of the adolescents reported that they felt aggressive, frustrated, or embarrassed as a result of having acne. The assessment of the impact of acne on the QoL is essential, to detect those patients who are at increased risk of being negatively affected so as to treat them in a more integrated manner. Hence, it is important for health professionals to incorporate QoL measurements when managing acne patients to provide better and appropriate care.
Financial Support and Sponsorship
Conflicts of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Krowchuk DP. Managing acne in adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am 2000;47:841-57.
Lello J, Pearl A, Arroll B, Yallop J, Birchall NM. Prevalence of acne vulgaris in Auckland senior high school students. N Z Med J 1995;108:287-9.
Koo JY, Smith LL. Psychologic aspects of acne. Pediatr Dermatol 1991;8:185-8.
Thomas DR. Psychosocial effects of acne. J Cutan Med Surg 2004;8 Suppl 4:3-5.
The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1403-9.
Barnes LE, Levender MM, Fleischer AB Jr., Feldman SR. Quality of life measures for acne patients. Dermatol Clin 2012;30:293-300, ix.
Adityan B, Kumari R, Thappa DM. Scoring systems in acne vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009;75:323-6.
] [Full text]
Tasoula E, Gregoriou S, Chalikias J, Lazarou D, Danopoulou I, Katsambas A, et al.
The impact of acne vulgaris on quality of life and psychic health in young adolescents in Greece. Results of a population survey. An Bras Dermatol 2012;87:862-9.
Hanisah A, Omar K, Shah SA. Prevalence of acne and its impact on the quality of life in school-aged adolescents in Malaysia. J Prim Health Care 2009;1:20-5.
Balkrishnan R, Kulkarni AS, Cayce K, Feldman SR. Predictors of healthcare outcomes and costs related to medication use in patients with acne in the United States. Cutis 2006;77:251-5.
Layton AM. Disorders of sebaceous glands. In: Burns T, Breathnach S, Cox N, Griffiths C, editors. Rook's Textbook of Dermatology. 8th
ed., Vol. 42. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publication; 2010. p. 1-89.
Ayer J, Burrows N. Acne: More than skin deep. Postgrad Med J 2006;82:500-6.
Fried RG, Gupta MA, Gupta AK. Depression and skin disease. Dermatol Clin 2005;23:657-64.
Fried RG, Wechsler A. Psychological problems in the acne patient. Dermatol Ther 2006;19:237-40.
Lasek RJ, Chren MM. Acne vulgaris and the quality of life of adult dermatology patients. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:454-8.
Rapp DA, Brenes GA, Feldman SR, Fleischer AB Jr., Graham GF, Dailey M, et al.
Anger and acne: Implications for quality of life, patient satisfaction and clinical care. Br J Dermatol 2004;151:183-9.
Jones-Caballero M, Chren MM, Soler B, Pedrosa E, Peñas PF. Quality of life in mild to moderate acne: Relationship to clinical severity and factors influencing change with treatment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007;21:219-26.
Walker N, Lewis-Jones MS. Quality of life and acne in Scottish adolescent schoolchildren: Use of the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) and the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:45-50.
Aghaei S, Mazharinia N, Jafari P, Abbasfard Z. The Persian version of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index. Reliability and validity study. Saudi Med J 2006;27:80-2.
Tejada Cdos S, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Almeida HL Jr., Figueiredo PN, Tejada VF. Impact on the quality of life of dermatological patients in Southern Brazil. An Bras Dermatol 2011;86:1113-21.
Durai PC, Nair DG. Acne vulgaris and quality of life among young adults in South India. Indian J Dermatol 2015;60:33-40.
] [Full text]
Jankovic S, Vukicevic J, Djordjevic S, Jankovic J, Marinkovic J. Quality of life among schoolchildren with acne: Results of a cross-sectional study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2012;78:454-8. [Full text]
Pawin H, Chivot M, Beylot C, Faure M, Poli F, Revuz J, et al.
Living with acne. A study of adolescents' personal experiences. Dermatology 2007;215:308-14.
Uslu G, Sendur N, Uslu M, Savk E, Karaman G, Eskin M. Acne: Prevalence, perceptions and effects on psychological health among adolescents in Aydin, Turkey. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008;22:462-9.
Rapp SR, Feldman SR, Graham G, Fleischer AB, Brenes G, Dailey M. The Acne Quality of Life Index (Acne-QOLI): Development and validation of a brief instrument. Am J Clin Dermatol 2006;7:185-92.
Ismail KH, Mohammed-Ali KB. Quality of life in patients with acne in Erbil city. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012;10:60.
Balkrishnan R, McMichael AJ, Hu JY, Camacho FT, Shew KR, Bouloc A, et al.
Correlates of health-related quality of life in women with severe facial blemishes. Int J Dermatol 2006;45:111-5.
Smithard A, Glazebrook C, Williams HC. Acne prevalence, knowledge about acne and psychological morbidity in mid-adolescence: A community-based study. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:274-9.
Kilkenny M, Merlin K, Plunkett A, Marks R. The prevalence of common skin conditions in Australian school students: 3. acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 1998;139:840-5.
Cotterill JA, Cunliffe WJ. Suicide in dermatological patients. Br J Dermatol 1997;137:246-50.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]